The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph presents detailed information about average individual CO2 emissions for UK, Sweden, Italy and Portugal citizens over the period 1967- 2007. On average UK generated most CO2 consistently among all the reported countries, while Portugal showed the smallest figure.
Before 1977, three out of the four countries kept a drastic increasing rate for average CO2 generation. Sweden, on the other hand, stood still at the same level until 1977, when it started a steady drop till the end of the sample period, 2007. Since 1997, the emissions declined sharply for Sweden with a much faster rate compared with UK. By the end of 2007, CO2 emissions of Sweden crossed with the lowest in graph, Portugal.
During the entire sample period, CO2 emission peaked at the beginning for the UK with 11metric tonnes. Sweden hits the high in 1978, slightly less than the UK at the same time. In contrast, Italy and Portugal started from 4.2 and 1, reach the top average CO2 emissions at the end with 7.8 and 5 respectively.
To summarize, The UK and Sweden see a trend of average CO2 emission steady declining, while Italy and Portugal rise gradually.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 128, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hile Italy and Portugal rise gradually.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
still, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 959.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9689119171 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48302784112 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575129533679 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.3229500707 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.9 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199729879581 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0949460787979 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690725889045 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14589827178 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0604424235206 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.