The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph compares the amount of fish, lamb, beef and chicken which was consumed weekly by each person in Europe over a period 25 years, starting from 1979.
Overall, the consumption of chicken increased significantly while ones of the other types of meat has opposite trend.
Looking at the detail, chicken was used the most popularly in a European country. This figure boosted from nearly 150 grams in 1979 to about 250 grams in 2004. The consumption of fish declined slightly during this period and fluctuated around 50 grams each person per week.
The other kinds of meat life beef and lamb witnessed a dramatically decrease in the consumption. In 1979, beef was preferred the most by inhabitants in a European country with under 225 grams per person, but this figure reduced to over 100 grams in 2004. The amount of lamb also has down trend from 150 grams to more 50 grams one person per week.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 54, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('dramatically') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decrease') instead of another adjective.
...ds of meat life beef and lamb witnessed a dramatically decrease in the consumption. In 1979, beef was p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 755.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77848101266 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41438068604 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575949367089 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 211.5 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.2776216867 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.375 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121072886221 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571984127362 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0269797995752 0.0843802449381 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0771074814097 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00883425205211 0.0819641961636 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.