The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
A glance at the figure reveals the fish and meat consumption of a European nation over the course of 25 years starting from 1979.
Overall, most of the figure dropped noticeably throughout the period surveyed. Yet, chicken was the only one which witnesses an upward trend.
It can be seen from the graph that in 1979, beef was most consumed meat, the consumption of fish, meanwhile, stood at the lowest point at significantly over 50 grams. It is interesting to note that the figures for chicken and lamb were nearly the same to each other. The former was roughly 148, while the latter was just over 150 grams. In the period of 1979 and 1994, the lamb and fish figures saw a gradual decline. Similarly, the consumption of beef reached a peak in 1983 before it markedly went down. In stark contrast, the data of chicken skyrocketed to roughly 240 grams.
At the end of this period, the three categories of beef, lamb and fish continued to drop steadily, a decline of 50, 20 and 5 grams respectively. The figure for chicken, by contrast, sharply climbed to the highest point, at slightly over 250 grams.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 918.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70769230769 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54311409945 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594871794872 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.1458453288 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.4545454545 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7272727273 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.81818181818 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0950569571719 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0361224555636 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506435649516 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0638693262352 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588784976522 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.