The graph below shows the contribution of three sectors-agriculture, manufacturing, and business and financial services-to the UK economy in the twentieth century.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features , and make comparison

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the contribution of three sectors-agriculture, manufacturing, and business and financial services-to the UK economy in the twentieth century.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features , and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart provides information on how three fields namely agriculture, manufacturing, and business and financial services contributed to the economy of UK in the period from 1900 to 2000.

It is clear that there was a substantial rise in the contribution of business and financial services in the period shown. By contrast, manufacturing was characterized by a exponential decline between 1990 and 2000.

In 1900, agriculture made the most considerable contribution to the economy of UK with approximately 50% while manufacturing accounted for a more minimal percentage, at around 45%. Additionally, the lowest figure of just around 3% belonged to business and financial services.

The same trend was clearly demonstrated in 1950 where agriculture reached a peak of roughly 55%, the highest percentage in the period shown, and afterwards experienced a dramatic plunge. Conversely , in 2000, business and financial services hit the peak of 30% doubling the proportion of manufacturing (15%), and agriculture reached the lowest percentage of about 3%.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ast, manufacturing was characterized by a exponential decline between 1990 and 20...
^
Line 7, column 198, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...xperienced a dramatic plunge. Conversely , in 2000, business and financial servic...
^^
Line 7, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a dramatic plunge. Conversely , in 2000, business and financial services hit the ...
^^
Line 7, column 357, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...culture reached the lowest percentage of about 3%.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 901.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59627329193 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40877701048 2.65546596893 128% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596273291925 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5981749992 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.714285714 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206281316753 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0994663907764 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0981676645723 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140148554428 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0986338484423 0.0819641961636 120% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 61.2550243902 65% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 11.4140731707 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.