the graph below shows the contribution of three sectors-agriculture, manufacturing, and business and financial services-to the UK economy in the twentieth century.

The bar graph shows the contribution of three selected parts economy in UK between 1900 and 2000.

It is obvious from the data that manufacturing had downward trend over a century while there was an upward trend in business and financial.

There was a fluctuation in agriculture in this period. In the first 50 years, agriculture increased slightly from 50 to 52 before a dramatic dropping by 50 in 50 years later. Manufacturing decreased steadily between 45 and 15 in the twentieth century but business and financial saw a continuous rise by 32 to 36 in 2000.

The rank of contribution in 1900 the same as in 1950 which were agriculture, manufacturing, business and financial respectively. The contribution of agriculture was more than 5 times business and financial in the first 50 years. In 1975, manufacturing was the highest contribution and 2 times agriculture was equal with business and financial. Business and Financial were the most contribution in 2000. The contribution rank was opposite with in the first 50 years.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 61, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'trended'.
Suggestion: trended
...he data that manufacturing had downward trend over a century while there was an upwar...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 867.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23478605636 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505882352941 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.9350904179 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.7 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.7 5.23603664747 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246159329512 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111469523182 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0951929600533 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148381149248 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107321108459 0.0819641961636 131% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.