The graph below shows how elderly people in Europe spent their free time between 1980 and 2010
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph gives information about kinds of free time activities that elderly people in Europe do from 1980s to 2010s. Overall, the rate of hiking increased significantly. On the other hand, playing sport remained stablest compared to others.
In the period between 1980s and 1990s, all activities increased considerably, only theatre dropped sharply, from 50% in 1980s to 30% in 1990s. Among five activities, playing sport is the most common one with the rate of more 60%. Meanwhile, surfing the Internet is the lowest with only around under 10% of the graph.
Over the 20-year period, the rate of all five activities changed dramatically. In 2010s, the rate of hiking reached the highest point, at 80% and became the most popular activity, Meanwhile, surfing the Internet also had an impressive increasing, from only 10% in 1990s to 50% in 2010s. Additionally, the fluctuation of reading can be noticed when it reached the lowest point, at 20% in 2000s but grew immediately in the next 10 years with the rate of 60%. Even though the percentage of playing sport decreased in 2010s but not remarkable and theatre was thought to be the most stable among five activities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 119, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1980s'.
Suggestion: in the 1980s
... only theatre dropped sharply, from 50% in 1980s to 30% in 1990s. Among five activities,...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 135, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990s
...opped sharply, from 50% in 1980s to 30% in 1990s. Among five activities, playing sport i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 80, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'In the 2010s'.
Suggestion: In the 2010s
...l five activities changed dramatically. In 2010s, the rate of hiking reached the highest...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 262, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990s
...an impressive increasing, from only 10% in 1990s to 50% in 2010s. Additionally, the fluc...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 278, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 2010s'.
Suggestion: in the 2010s
...creasing, from only 10% in 1990s to 50% in 2010s. Additionally, the fluctuation of readi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 385, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 2000s'.
Suggestion: in the 2000s
...hen it reached the lowest point, at 20% in 2000s but grew immediately in the next 10 yea...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 512, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 2010s'.
Suggestion: in the 2010s
...e percentage of playing sport decreased in 2010s but not remarkable and theatre was thou...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 983.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98984771574 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69186816961 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573604060914 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.343003707 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0614073287709 0.215688989381 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0277676623717 0.103423049105 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653450816795 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0619367053035 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0668088030334 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.