The graph below shows the number of complaints made about noise to Environmental Health authorities in the city of Newtown between 1980 to 1996.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.
The line chart illustrates the amount of grumbles of Newtown’s citizens about clamour created by the four different activities from 1980 to 1996. Overall, there was only the number of complaints created by road work activities that decreased significantly over the period of 16 years, in contrast, the amount of grumbles about domestic and household noises increased rapidly from 1980 to 1996.
First of all, the number of grumbles about road work clamour started at over 600 times in 1980, this number was highest when comparing with the other three origin of noises in that year. After this starting, this amount reduced considerably and ended at approximately 70 times in 1996. Besides that change, roughly three times as many the number of grumbles made by domestic and household noises in 1986 (400 times) as in 1996 ( 1200 times). According to this considerable increase, domestic and household doings were the activities which were complained the most in Newtown. Finally, from the graph, the number of grumbles about factories’ clamour was 400 times in 1980, after this, it rose slightly to over 700 times in 1986 and that was higher than other three types. Then, the number of this type of clamour leveled out at 700 times between 1986 and 1996.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 424, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hold noises in 1986 400 times as in 1996 1200 times. According to this considerab...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, first, if, then, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1052.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03349282297 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61105524395 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488038277512 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5050502474 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.5 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.125 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159989518125 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0820042993408 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.035258799407 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136641444604 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0110749607087 0.0819641961636 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.