The line graph illustrates the differences in the number of people visiting the specific Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.
In general, the number of tourists has increased significantly over the period. In 2010, there was a total number of visitors of 1 million which grew rapidly up to more than 2,5 millions in 2015. After that, it did not experience any changes until 2016 when people became more interested. Eventually, it ended up with approximately 3,5 millions of visitors in 2017.
However, there were two groups of people who preferred staying either on ships or on the island, that accounted for 0,75 and 0,25 respectively in the beginning of the period. In 2011, the number of island visitors started to rise, whereas trips on ships slightly decreased and then started to go up in 2012. Despite the fact that tourism on cruise ships was increasing in 2013, the other group was remaining the same. In 2015, the pattern became the opposite, finishing with 2 millions of cruise ships trips and 1,5 of the other group.
In conclusion, although staying on the island was more interesting than staying on ships until 2015, people started travelling on ships more than staying on land in 2016.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 335, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '5 million'.
Suggestion: 5 million
...ually, it ended up with approximately 3,5 millions of visitors in 2017. However, there wer...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 476, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '2 million'.
Suggestion: 2 million
...ern became the opposite, finishing with 2 millions of cruise ships trips and 1,5 of the other...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, whereas, in conclusion, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1014.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97058823529 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60808269576 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549019607843 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.896081264 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.4 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121713314301 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602593561317 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0899804245753 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112418264594 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119982381401 0.0819641961636 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.