The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph given illustrates the information about the number of people who aged 65 years and more, in the three countries, namely USA, Sweden, Japan over the course 100 years from 1940 to 2040.
It is clear that the percentage of the population in the elderly saw an upward trend in the three countries. In particular, there was a significant increase in the old ages in Japan.
In 1994, around 9% of American were within the elderly group while Japan basted the least number of elderly people, with 5%. The number of Swedish belonged to ages 65 and more, stood at 7% in the period.
Regarding the USA, It climbed significantly to 15% in 1980 before going down in 2000, around 14%. The expectation is that the figure for the USA will experience sharp growth from 15% in 2020 to about 22% in 2040. Similarly, the percentage of elderly people in Sweden accounted for nearly matched the trend of the United States until about the year 1998. At this point, the rate of Sweden increases dramatically after falling slightly, approximately 20%. It is anticipated to decrease moderately until when it will go up again to a high of just over 25% in 2040.
As for Japan, It dropped to 3% in 1960, but this figure saw slow growth. The rate is predicted to boom to 5% in 2005 to 10% just a quarter - century later. By 2040, It is expected that the percentage of elder Japanese will have rocketed to the highest rate of 25%.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, similarly, while, as for, in particular

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 33.7804878049 175% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1166.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 256.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5546875 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51551530041 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 106.607317073 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5703125 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4804902753 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6923076923 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6923076923 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.53846153846 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129416391244 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0428128586964 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593308042419 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0835497291605 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0717736019027 0.0819641961636 88% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.11 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.