The graph below shows the quantities of goods exported from Russia to several countries between 1975 and 2010 by different modes of transport

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the quantities of goods exported from Russia to several countries between 1975 and 2010 by different modes of transport.

The line chart depicts the information about the quantities of goods in million tonnes exported from Russia to other countries by several modes of transportation in 35 years from 1975 to 2010.

It can be seen from the chart that large amount of goods are transported through water transportation. Around 90 million tonnes of goods were exported through it in 1975. However, it consistently increases during 35 years of span and ends at 130 million tonnes of in 2010. The other mode of transportation which is preferred is road ways. In 1975 around 60 million tonnes of goods were exported from road ways and the value increased at 82 million tonnes in 2010.

In railways 1975 around 52 million tonnes of goods which reached at 30 million tonnes in 1995 and then increased gradually and reached at 58 million tonnes in 2010. The least quantity exported by the mode of transportation is airways. In 1975 around 8 million tonnes moved by airways and increases till 40 million tonnes.

Finally, it can be seen that all modes of transportation has a significant increase in the quantity of goods being transported.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (5 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...mation about the quantities of goods in million tonnes exported from Russia to other co...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ncreased at 82 million tonnes in 2010. In railways 1975 around 52 million tonne...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 930.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92063492063 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85184694368 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.460317460317 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.4970369286 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291526694924 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153970410418 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118778639666 0.0843802449381 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234045384717 0.15604864568 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128737591007 0.0819641961636 157% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.95 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.