The graph below shows the quantities of goods exported from Russia and several countries between 1975 and 2010 by different modes of transport.
summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart depicts the information about the quantities of goods in million tonnes exported from Russia to other countries by several modes of transportation in 35 years from 1975 to 2010.
It can be seen from the chart that large amount of goods are transported through water transportation. Around 90 million tonnes of goods were exported through water ways in 1975. However, it consistently increases during 35 years of span and ends at 130 million tonnes of transportation in 2010. The other mode of transportation which is preferred next is road ways. In 1975 around 60 million tonnes of goods were exported from road ways and the value increased at 80 million tonnes for next 15 years. Then the number of goods exported by road ways decreased till 2005 and reached at 75 million tonnes and at the end it stopped at 82 million tonnes in 2010.
The next used mode of exporting the goods is Railways. In 1975 around 52 million tonnes of goods were transported by railways but it can be seen that there is a constant decrease in the quantity of goods exported by railways in next 20 years. It reached at 30 million tonnes in 1995 and then increased gradually and reached at 58 million tonnes in 2010. The least quantity exported by the mode of transportation in airways. In 1975 around 8 million tonnes were exported by airways and the quantity increases till the end and reaches at 40 million tonnes.
Finally, it can be seen that all modes of transportation has a significant increase in the quantity of goods being transported. The maximum quantity of good is preferred to be transported by water ways and the least is preferred by airways.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...mation about the quantities of goods in million tonnes exported from Russia to other co...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 242, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and the least is preferred by airways.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 33.7804878049 186% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1371.0 965.302439024 142% => OK
No of words: 288.0 196.424390244 147% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76041666667 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78152308272 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.375 0.547539520022 68% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 379.8 283.868780488 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5948750158 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9285714286 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.21428571429 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21857788967 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115491346884 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0805613013611 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194851097227 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0966855993132 0.0819641961636 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.55 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.