This line graph illustrates the number of employees in the mining industry in Australia between 1900 and 1990.
A quick glance at the graph reveals that the amount of people in thousands who were employed in the Australian mining industry was declined significantly over the research period, although there was a peak in the number of workers in 1950.
At the beginning of this century, there was more 60,000 people employed in this sector, but by the end of the first decade, this decreased enormously to only 40,000 people. The number of workers continued to fall gradually throughout from the 1920’s to the 1940’s by 10,000 people. There was a sudden surge in the fifth decade and reached a peak at about 50,000 people in 1950. From 1951 onwards, Australian mining industry employees started again a decline and was marked by the dramatic drop at the beginning of 1960s from 40,000 to around 20,000 people in 1970. By 1990, only 15,000 people were working in this sector in Australia.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 833.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92899408284 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55598015595 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520710059172 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 226.8 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2648539456 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185412500113 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0980279603215 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602692658647 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153414158376 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265741580844 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.