The line graph illustrates the amoount of goods transported in the United Kingdom from 1974 to 2002 by using different means of transport.
Overall, it can be seen that, road transport was the most popular one among the 4 during the period. Transport of goods using pipelines were comparatively low.
To begin, in 1974, around 70 million tonnes of goods were transported by road. This figure gradually increased and reached around 80 million tonnes in 1998, before peaking at about 100 million tonnes in 2002. Transport of goods using pipelines were the lowest among the four, from approximately 3 million tonnes in 1974, to around 20 million tonnes in 2002.
By contrast, both waterways and rail started at the same value of 40 million tonnes in 1974.After 1974, the figures for the former rose, reaching around 56 million tonnes in 1998, before peaking to approximately 66 million tonnes in 2002. Similarly, the latter withnessed a reverse trend, declining to around 25 million tonnes in 1994, however; after this point the figures climbed rapidly, reaching to just over 40 million tonnes by the end of the period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 93, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: After
...same value of 40 million tonnes in 1974.After 1974, the figures for the former rose,...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 131, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...4.After 1974, the figures for the former rose, reaching around 56 million tonnes ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, similarly
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 940.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05376344086 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59028218522 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532258064516 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2303501171 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.5 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155234610194 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104833455158 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0865000663199 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139190924558 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0914069685635 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.