The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the
population between 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and
2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make
comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The two given graphs indicated the computer ownership in a specific nation on an interval from 2002 to 2010. Information shown in the former chart represented the possession according to citizenship, whereas the latter one illustrated the relevant datas with each owners’ education level.
At the first glance, we can see that there were an increasing trend in the first paragraph. The number of people who personal PC grew over time. For eight year, the proportion of residents who own computer expand nearly 20 percentages, from over 50% in 2002 to approximately 70% of 2010. The escalation went up gradually, with an average of 5% soared every 2 years.
Moving to the second chart, it was clear that there was no 2002 data enlarged 2010’s proportion, and the possession of personal PC rose in compliance with each’s schooling background. There were an 30% increase in the first 3 groups in the number of people own computer, between 2002 & 2010. Within the same period, the percentage gaps was smaller as in the figure reported for the two remaining group. After 8 years, the datas risen from under and over 70% to approximately 90% , as sequent to bachelors and post-graduators.
From these perspective, we can conclude that from 2002 to 2010, the data of personal computer possesion went up gently. Also, the more educated people are, the more tendency for them to own a computer.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 359, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...period, the percentage gaps was smaller as in the figure reported for the two rema...
^^
Line 5, column 489, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... under and over 70% to approximately 90% , as sequent to bachelors and post-gradua...
^^
Line 7, column 6, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this perspective' or 'these perspectives'?
Suggestion: this perspective; these perspectives
... bachelors and post-graduators. From these perspective, we can conclude that from 2002 to 2010...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1177.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05150214592 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91247298155 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596566523605 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 342.0 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.70621278 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0833333333 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4166666667 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205583813124 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701142662498 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603021266519 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128791004808 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434129121322 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.