The graphs shows figures relating to hours works and stress levels amongst professionals in eight groups
Weekly working hours spent by people in eight different occupations and the rate of those suffering stress related to their jobs is depicted by given graphs.
Generally speaking, the time which businessmen expended to work during seven days is the longest, and others varied, while the group suffering from anxiety issues at most to accomplish their tasks relates to lecturers.
As per data, the entrepreneurs are the most productive, accounting for 70 hours, being the maximum number recorded, and only 11% of them are indicated to possess mental health problems. Meanwhile, filmmakers reveal a gap of ten hours with the former, but if the stress level is compared to previous one, they are not better at managing it, observed at 18%. Then, healthcare practitioners allocate the time, virtually 51 hours, whom the work pressure reaches at less than a fifth.
Professionals occupied in writing expend 45 hours, sharing the percentage of work pressure as similar as lawyers at 8% struggling for their jobs throughout 35 hours. Furthermore, chefs experience only one in tenth of such illness issues, although they spend 30 hours to cook. This contrasts to programmers having hours as many as people cooking, although lecturers’ time is less than those at 25, they can not deal with difficulties, ranked as the most stressful profession at a quarter.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 330, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... to programmers having hours as many as ones cooking, although lecturers’ time is le...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1132.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16894977169 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82730640657 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 106.607317073 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.671232876712 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.9911013307 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.5 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.375 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181987421057 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756061094892 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585343822104 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118783757296 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051839022335 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 40.7170731707 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.