The line graph below shows the percantage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.
Summarise the information by selactig and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the proportion of visitors to four different well-known places for tourists in Brighton in England from 1980 to 2010.
Overall, the percentage of people visiting Pavilion and Pier increased while the figure for Art Gallery and Festival saw a decrease throughout the period shown.
In the year 1980, the proportion of tourists who visited Festival was the highest, at exact 30%, compared to about 25% of people visiting Pavilion. The figures for Art Gallery and Pier wew lover, at above 20% and 10% respectively. In 1995, the percentage of people who cae to Pavilion reached the highest point at about 50%. The figure for Pier went up gradually despite fluctuations. By contrast, there was a decline in the proportion of people coming to both Art Gallery and Festival, to about 20% and 25% respectively.
A significant fall was recorded in the percentage of tourists visiting Pavilion from 1995 to 2010. Likewise, there was a decline by about 10% in the figure for Art Gallery. By contrast, the peoportion of people who came to Pier experienced a considerable rise to over 20%. The figure for Festival saw a slight increase to about 27% in 2010
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 981.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95454545455 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81229245966 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474747474747 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.9647362096 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1818181818 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.27272727273 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101197243193 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0437868850129 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638979625471 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0858576822949 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0768718483361 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.