The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.
The given line graph reveals the comparison of tourist visitors of Art gallery, Pavilion, Pier and Festival in the city of England, Brighton from 1980 to 2010.Units are measured in percentages.
Overall, the highest data was shown by Pier visitors, while Festival’s visitors indicated the lowest percentage.
In 1980 Pavilion tourist guests’ proportion was nearly a fifth while Art Gallery’s was a quarter. Following that, there was a significant escalate from 1980 to 1985, where, it reached a pick with just fewer than 40% in figure of Pavilion visitors. However, this data was almost 10% less than Art Gallery’s pick point in 1995(approximately a half). Nevertheless, these both Art Gallery and Pavilion’s data steeply plunged from 1995 to 2010.
Despite the highest proportion of 30% in initial year, Pier tourists showed a steady decline to 1995(30% and 25% accordingly), meantime, there was a fluctuation in Festival’s during the same period. Additionally, in latest given decade the percentage of visitors of Pier attraction remained constant with approximation of 30%. On the other hand, Festival’s figure rapidly quadrupled in period of 10 years from 2000 to 2010(almost 11% to 21% respectively).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Units
... of England, Brighton from 1980 to 2010.Units are measured in percentages. Overal...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...1985, where, it reached a pick with just fewer than 40% in figure of Pavilion vis...
^^
Line 7, column 217, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the latest'.
Suggestion: in the latest
...s during the same period. Additionally, in latest given decade the percentage of visitors...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, however, if, nevertheless, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1057.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59259259259 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40959212225 2.65546596893 128% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624338624339 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1078631018 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.444444444 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 5.23603664747 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0926219739696 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0402759094442 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582179489775 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0681742636841 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0716149680604 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 11.4140731707 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.