The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph illustrates the proportion of travellers to England came to various destinations in Brighton during 1980-2010 period.
As an overall, the percentage of visitors in Pavilion and Pier witnessed increasing trends, while that of tourists to Art Gallery and Festival decreased over 30-year period.
In 1980, the number of travellers in Pavilion accounted for about 23% of the total. This figure inclined significantly, before it reached a peak at just under 50% in 1995. There is then a fall in the portion of Pavilion visitors to 35% in 2000, and approximately 30% in 2010. Meanwhile, only 10% of tourists visited Pier in 1980, following by a growth to just above 20% at the end of the period, despite fluctuations.
Over the same period, the segment of people visited Festival experienced a slight drop from exactly 30% to roughly 27%. In 1980, the figure for visitors to the Art Gallery was 21%. After peaking at 38% in 1985, this percentage fell remarkably to just under 20% in 1990. The proportion saw a slow decrease and finished the whole period at 8%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 895.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94475138122 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81748455614 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585635359116 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.987270272 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 5.23603664747 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0685305921468 0.215688989381 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0259434381682 0.103423049105 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0312478003842 0.0843802449381 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0519704247136 0.15604864568 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270389569688 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.