The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.
The chart compares the proportion of tourists to England who visited four different Brighton attractions including the art gallery, pavilion, pier and festival from 1980 to 2010. Overall, various trends of attractions in Brighton could be observed, including a growth of pavilion and pier, a decline of art gallery and festival over the period.
In 1980, the festival was the highest of the percentage of tourists, followed by the pavilion, art gallery and pier. From 1980 to 1985, the rate of tourists to the art gallery witnessed a significant rise from over 20% to over a third, considerably surpassing the pavilion's, pier's and festival's percentage of tourists in the same period. On the other hand, the proportion of tourists to the festival diminished slightly from 30% to under 30%, making this attraction fall behind the pavilion which experienced a steady increase from around 25% to nearly 30%. Similarly, the pier went up marginally from 10% to 15%.
From 1985 to 2010, the percentage of tourists to pavilion reached a peak of nearly a half in 1995, then fell substantially to around 30%. Surprisingly, the art gallery saw a remarkable reduction to under 10% in the rate of tourists, while the pier rose sharply to over 20%. Finally, the percentage of tourists to the festival decreased but after that increased to 18% in 2010.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, similarly, then, third, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1121.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0269058296 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84894919089 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497757847534 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0884007516 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.555555556 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7777777778 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.23603664747 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178166981767 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0848870144222 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0948281760571 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140673638185 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0777890347656 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.