Line graph-describing trend
The graph below shows the number of passenger railway journeys made in Great Britain between 1950 and 2004/5.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line graph shows information about the passenger trips figure using three railways: the National Rail Network, London Underground and light rail and metro system in Great Britain, from 1950 to 2005. Overall, the three lines show variation.
It is clearly to see that lots of people chose the national rail network or The London Underground, as at the start of the chart in 1950 there were a total of 1000 and 700 journeys taken, respectively. Then in the early 1980s the figures varied and later went down to about 600 by national railway and 500 by London Underground, but at the end they both increased to approximately 1000 at each.
Meanwhile, there was a contrast in the number of people taking trips by light rail and metro system which was used later than the two remain, started from the early 1960s until now. There were just a few trips, less than 100 at first, then in 1980 mostly no one using this kind of transportation. The number of passengers, however rose slightly as nearly 200 journeys were taken in 2004/05.
It is noticeable that British preferred the National Rail Network and London Underground than light rail and metro, and there were more and more people traveled by trains.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, then, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1006.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79047619048 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49296515889 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566666666667 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7626637853 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.75 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.25 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113468279469 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0570562113036 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614432740489 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0725197935592 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0772444688626 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.