The line graph shows the income of four cafes in New York over last year.
The line chart compares the last year revenue of 4 coffee shops located in NY.
Overall, the profits of all 4 cafes fluctuated consecutively by months. It is clear that The Tea Room was the only unprofitable business among these 4 shops last year.
The profits of The Tea Room and Internet Express were nearly 160k and 100k respectively in Jan. The Tea Room’s income had a tendency to go down and it ended the year at somewhere around 50k which was the lowest revenue over the previous year. Meanwhile, the data of the internet express showed that they had managed to raise their revenue to above 130k by the end of the year.
Wi-fi cafe was always one step ahead Cafe cool in terms of income throughout the given period, however they both witnessed a huge progress by the end of last year. Wifi cafe earned around 50k dollars in the 1st month while this number of cafe cool was only about 30k. The next 7 months witnessed a slight improvement in the revenue of wifi cafe but a fluctuation of cafe cool. There was a considerable drop in wife cafe’s income in Sept before reaching its peak at approximately 190k by Dec. Cafe cool, however, constantly enhanced their profit over the remainder of the year and also got the highest number at roughly 120k in Dec.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 148, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m’s income had a tendency to go down and it ended the year at somewhere around 50...
^^
Line 3, column 378, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e to above 130k by the end of the year. Wi-fi cafe was always one step ahead Caf...
^^^
Line 4, column 124, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'huge progress'.
Suggestion: huge progress
...ven period, however they both witnessed a huge progress by the end of last year. Wifi cafe earn...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1038.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55263157895 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42505390179 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565789473684 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.0236028028 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3636363636 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7272727273 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269602335487 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101459072397 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488426875549 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155732112225 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346699322144 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.11 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.