The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The maps depict several significant changes in the village of Stokeford in the two different years 1930 and 2010. Overall, it is clear that the lands of agriculture purposes disappeared, while the number of houses increased significantly.
In 1930, most lands of the village were natural with a few houses located along both sides of the river of the village. However, by 2010, the two areas of farmland to the south-west and to the north-east of the village were converted to residential areas. Over the same period, the more streets were built, leading off the main street to give access to additional houses. The local shops had disappeared for this changes except the post office had been remained.
In addition, in this period, the primary school, which is opposite the office, was enlarged with 2 blocks. The size of the garden in the middle of the village was reduced and the large houses were extended in this site to become the retirement home. Finally, the River Stoke was remained unchanged throughout the period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 409, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...es. The local shops had disappeared for this changes except the post office had been...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 858.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95953757225 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58015931529 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606936416185 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.8486610281 43.030603864 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.3333333333 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114784268546 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0462448304481 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0654156544016 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0819609311435 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522097420247 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.