People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.

Decision making is a very crucial aspect of human development. The path that one lives is sculpted by their decisions and consequences. In the following paragraphs I will discuss the addressed topic with my point of view, justifications and examples.
First of all, I want to make clear that emotion and logic are in two separated areas and differ in nature. Logic is purely reasonable and scientific and emotion as much to do with sentiments and feelings that sometimes are not logic.
Making important decisions only based on emotion can be very dangerous since it lacks logic and data to back it up. For example, investing in something or someone only based on the first impressions, style or the feelings that you have for that particular person.
On the contrary, since we are all human beings and not robots, we are guided not only by logic but also by emotions. Like when we chose our partner, the altruism given to our loved ones and charity acts. All these examples contain important decisions that are driven by emotion and sometimes represent a paradigm in which people debate. Nevertheless, emotion can sometimes be used to decide when logic is lacking. Many times people say that they have a gut feeling that something is not going to work fine and most of the times they are right. The human brain is designed to use the conscious and subconscious mind and therefore only focusing in the logic part may be wrong and very limited.
In summary, people who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards can be poor decision makers since they haven´t gotten data or quantifiable information to back it up but since we are only humans and design to have a subconscious brain they may be not so poor decision makers afterall.

Votes
Average: 4.7 (3 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... paragraphs I will discuss the addressed topic with my point of view, justificati...
^^
Line 5, column 321, Rule ID: AFTERALL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'after all'?
Suggestion: after all
...they may be not so poor decision makers afterall.
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, for example, in summary, first of all, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 7.0 257% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 22.0 6.8 324% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 3.15609756098 380% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 28.0 5.60731707317 499% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 965.302439024 153% => OK
No of words: 305.0 196.424390244 155% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83278688525 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66709572827 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 106.607317073 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514754098361 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 477.0 283.868780488 168% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.0986706618 43.030603864 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.285714286 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7857142857 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.410188942988 0.215688989381 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125452286045 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130739306356 0.0843802449381 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236383780353 0.15604864568 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139064620798 0.0819641961636 170% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 40.7170731707 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.