the pie chart below show units of electricity production by fuel source in australia and france in 1980 and 2000.

Essay topics:

the pie chart below show units of electricity production by fuel source in australia and france in 1980 and 2000.

The given pie charts illustrate the year 1980 and 2000 saw a large discrepancy of the percentage of fuel source which is an electricity production in two different countries Australia and France.
Overall, Australia in 2000 was accounted for the highest of total electricity production in comparison with the others. Besides, there was vast change in the units of electricity by fuel source over the given period.
In Australia, not only did the total production in 2000 constitute 170 units of electricity, but it also was higher than that of 1980, which stood at 100 units. Moreover, regarding the year 1980, 50% of fuel source was allocated for coal, which was the highest comparing to the others, then dramatically boosted to 130% in 2000. In addition, the gradual rise of 5% was witnessed in the proportion of hydro power in 2000, except natural gas and oil which followed an opposite trend.
In France, there was a fluctuation of 25% in the figure of coal over the 20-year period, regardless of the percentage of nuclear power which was seen in the significant growth of 111%. Additionally, the year 2000 experienced a marginal development of 5% in the percentage of oil. By contrast, that of hydro power and natural gas was vanished in 2000.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, moreover, regarding, so, then, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1042.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91509433962 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83908977637 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528301886792 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5908940651 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.777777778 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.23603664747 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293101721746 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135158721345 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109420097853 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218469669523 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121231719202 0.0819641961636 148% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.