The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided Pie chart picturizes the major reasons behind the degradation of land across the world whereas the table outlines the same data for specific regions for the decade commencing in 1990. At a glance, it is deductible that there were three distinct reasons for world wide land degradation.
Digging into the details, among several reasons for the degradation of land, with 35%, Over-grazing turns out to be the most harmful. 30% of the degraded land has to keep deforestation behind them as a reason, which is followed by Over-Cultivation with 28%.
Getting into regions, The North Americas are having the least of their lands degraded. Among the three, the Europe is having the most land degraded with 23%. A striking fact to note here is that all these three regions have different reasons to blame for their degraded lands. North Americas blame over-cultivation, while the Europe to deforestation and Oceania to over-grazing.
To summarize, among all the reasons of land getting degraded, over-cultivation, overgrazing and deforestation are the most noticeable ones.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 271, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: worldwide
...t there were three distinct reasons for world wide land degradation. Digging into the d...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 271, Rule ID: WORLD_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worldwide'?
Suggestion: worldwide
...t there were three distinct reasons for world wide land degradation. Digging into the d...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 916.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32558139535 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.086678227 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575581395349 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4451612829 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.777777778 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 1.13902439024 790% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136346448105 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641947756752 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410629503129 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0870043743971 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454704860034 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.