The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graphs demonstrate the prime causes of worldwide land degredation and the effects of these problems in North America, Europe and Oceania in 1990s.
Overall, it can be seen clearly that the degradation in Europe was more severe than other parts of the world, and worldwide degredation was caused mostly by over-grazing.
On a global scale, the excessive of animal grazing and crops cultivation were the biggest reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive, accounting for 35% and 30% of global degredation respectively. Not far behind, 28% of land degredation in the world was caused by deforestation.
These causes affected the farming land in North America, Europe and Oceania in different ways. 9.8% land degradated in Europe was due to deforestation, while the effect was minimal in North America (0.2%) and Oceania (1.7%). Over-cultivation also saw a big impact in Europe as 7.7% of degredation was caused by this reason. On the other hand, over-grazing was the main reason for degredation in Oceania with a whooping number of 11.3%. Europe was the region least affected by these causes, as only 5% of agricultural land was degredated.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 142, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990s
...ms in North America, Europe and Oceania in 1990s. Overall, it can be seen clearly th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 448, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'region the least'.
Suggestion: region the least
...hooping number of 11.3%. Europe was the region least affected by these causes, as only 5% of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 976.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24731182796 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04726326215 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559139784946 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0953250971 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.444444444 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170823646567 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860977475492 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0391880952937 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107954377058 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467392586676 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.