The table gives information about the cost of fish imported to US. The pie chart illustrates sources of fish imported to US from 1988 to 2000.
It is clear in the table that the total value increases every years which shown in the table. Overall in the pie chart, while the percentage of Canada and China increase, this figure of orthers decrease.
In 1988, the cost of fish imported to US stood at 6.57 billions of dollar. This figure rose to 8.52 billions of dollar. Futhermore, it significant jumped to 10.72 billions of dollar by 2000.
In 1988, China had lowest percentage of source of fis...
Subscribe as testbig VIP readers and get unlimited access to essays on the top list.
Votes
Essay Categories
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 53, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '57 billion'.
Suggestion: 57 billion
... cost of fish imported to US stood at 6.57 billions of dollar. This figure rose to 8.52 billio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 98, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '52 billion'.
Suggestion: 52 billion
...llions of dollar. This figure rose to 8.52 billions of dollar. Futhermore, it significant jump...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 161, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '72 billion'.
Suggestion: 72 billion
...Futhermore, it significant jumped to 10.72 billions of dollar by 2000. In 1988, China had l...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 16, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the lowest'.
Suggestion: had the lowest
...ns of dollar by 2000. In 1988, China had lowest percentage of source of fish, about 13%...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 265, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...to 42% and China continually grew to 30% . Thus, others droped to 34$ in 1992 and ...
^^
Line 7, column 291, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$34'.
Suggestion: $34
...ly grew to 30% . Thus, others droped to 34$ in 1992 and continually went down to 28...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 735.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65189873418 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45640764754 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563291139241 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 207.0 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 16.5755844543 43.030603864 39% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 61.25 112.824112599 54% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.1666666667 22.9334400587 57% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.58333333333 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.418330258673 0.215688989381 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146218415469 0.103423049105 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1696118393 0.0843802449381 201% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269923653578 0.15604864568 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.239066564061 0.0819641961636 292% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.1 13.2329268293 54% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 83.66 61.2550243902 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 10.3012195122 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.8 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.