The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The presented pie charts fractionalize the average household expenditure of the Japan and Malaysia. A glance at the charts reveals that the major portion of household expenditure is behind housing, transport, and food, whilst least is spend upon healthcare.
Digging into the numbers of the Japan, Major portion of the expenditure goes to food, Housing, and transportation with about 20% each. The striking fact to note here is, only 6% of the expenditure is related to health care. Other goods and services take about 25%-30% of the expenditure in both Japan and Malaysia.
Keeping Malaysia and Japan side by side, it becomes clear that Malaysians spends quite more on Housing and Food individually. Further, where transportation expenditure was around 20% is Japan, it went down to only 10% in Malaysia. To add more, Expenditure behind Health care goes down even more and reaches a new low of only 3% in Malaysia.
Overall, There are both similarities and differences about how much and where Malaysians and Japanese people spend their money.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
...g, transport, and food, whilst least is spend upon healthcare. Digging into the nu...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 884.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87499661501 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582352941176 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.4360950931 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.2222222222 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.222222222222 5.23603664747 4% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21140545346 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104438819643 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0960547918613 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127915575212 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0771806030514 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.