The four pie charts illustrate the portion of electricity production with regard to types of fuels in France and Australia in 1980 and 2000.
The most striking difference in the data was that exactly have of total units of Australia electricity was produced by coal in 1980, whereas by 2000 this number has increased to just over 75 percent. By contrast, nearly three quarters of energy generated by nuclear power in France in 2000.
By 1980, only 10 out of 100 units of electricity was converted from combustion of oil in Australia, which was two times lower than the amount of units produced in France. However, far fewer units of french electricity as opposed australian were generated in hydroelectric power plants, only 2 and 36 respectively in 2000.
When's the main source of electricity in Australian remained coal with increasing proportion, nuclear power became more integrated into French electricity system by 2000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: When's
... only 2 and 36 respectively in 2000. Whens the main source of electricity in Austr...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, whereas, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 786.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17105263158 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84819036682 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605263157895 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6848135911 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273171390705 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139609003525 0.103423049105 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0853864413514 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181247211272 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0833658959797 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.