The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts compare the sources of electricity in Australia and France from 19080 to 2000.
Generally, It can be seen from the pie charts between 1980 and 2000, electricity almost doubled, rising from 100 units to 170 units in Australia and from 90 units to 180 units in France. Besides, by 2000 these two countries replied on different principal fuel sources: Australia on coal and France on nuclear power.
In 1980, the most commonly-used electricity source in Australia was coal (50 units) and the remainder was produced from natural gas, hydropower ( each producing 20 units) and oil (which produced only 10 units). On the other hand, by 2000, coal continued to use as the main fuel for more than 75% of electricity produced and hydropower was another significant source supplying approximately 20%.
In contrast, France used coal and natural gas as the most important sources (25 units) in 1980. The remaining were produced largely from oil (20 units) and nuclear power (15 units), but hydropower contributed only 5 units. However, by 2000, nuclear power, which was not used at all Australia, had developed into the main fuel (126 units), while both coal and oil produced only 25 units. Other sources were no longer significant.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 142, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as produced from natural gas, hydropower each producing 20 units and oil which pr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, so, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1019.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99509803922 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65370896676 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544117647059 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8471444505 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.222222222 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 5.23603664747 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251171855028 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126386679479 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0716399964411 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196724782907 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620114950373 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.