The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
The given pie charts describe the how Australia and France make the electricity using various kinds of fuel source and shows their units. The survey was recorded in 1980 and 2000.
As we seen clearly in the chars, in 1980 Australia had been majorly used coal for energy production, while in 2000 nuclear power was became the first choice for electricity generation about 130 units. Furthermore, Natural gas and hydro power had been contributed about 20 units and 10 untis accordingly in 1980 in Australia, whereas same source had been decreased substantially in 2000 in Australia about 2 units both.
Moving further, Natural gas and coal were popular choice for electricity creation about 25 units in 1980 in France. Although, in 2000 coal constituted same units of energy as in 1980, in used of nuclear power was significantly rose up about 126 units. Moreover, in 1980 natural gas and hydro power were not used as primary source, as a result consumption of same source would be became very less in 2000 in France.
Overall, in 1980 both nations produced less amount of energy units; However, in 2000 amount of units had been escalated by great margin. Also, coal was the first choice for Australia, while nuclear power was primary source for France in both years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 31, Rule ID: THE_HOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'how'?
Suggestion: how
The given pie charts describe the how Australia and France make the electrici...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 7, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[1]
Message: Possible grammatical error. You used a past participle without using any required verb ('be' or 'have'). Did you mean 'saw'?
Suggestion: saw
...was recorded in 1980 and 2000. As we seen clearly in the chars, in 1980 Australia...
^^^^
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
...uction, while in 2000 nuclear power was became the first choice for electricity genera...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 228, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'risen'.
Suggestion: risen
...used of nuclear power was significantly rose up about 126 units. Moreover, in 1980 n...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, whereas, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1060.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93023255814 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50172898568 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483720930233 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6780808533 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.777777778 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8888888889 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8888888889 5.23603664747 208% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324383422418 0.215688989381 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151016833605 0.103423049105 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830160076018 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236244434718 0.15604864568 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114095954175 0.0819641961636 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.