The four pie charts illustrate the amount of electricity produced by different sources of fuel in Australia and France between 1980 and 2000.
Overall, coal was the major fuel source used in production of electricity in Australia both in 1980 and 2000, whilst, in France coal and natural gas were the greatest producer as they contributed equally in 1980, as nuclear power was the major in 2000.
The total number of electricity units produced in Australia in 1980 were 1000units, then 170units in 2000. It is clearly seen on the pie chart that coal contributed half of the electricity produced in 1980. Hydropower and natural gas produced an equal amount of electricity, at 20units produced in Australia, whilst, oil was the least with production of 10units. In the year 2000 in Australia, coal fuel contributed enormously a total number of 130units. The average producer of electricity was by hydro power which contributed 36units, as natural gas and oil produced insignificant equal amount of 2 units each.
It is clearly seen that in France the total number of electricity produced in 1980 was 90units and 180units in 2000. Coal and gas produced similar amount of electricity, at 25units each. The average contributers were oil and nuclear power as they produce 20units and 15units of electricity respectively. Production of electricity by hydro power gave an output of 5units which was the least. In the year 2000, nuclear power had the greatest contribution of 126units of electricity, whilst coal and oil produced equal amount of electricity, at 25units each. Hydro power and natural gas produced a similar amount of electrical energy, at 2units each.
To sumup, in Australia the major contributer in electricity production was coal. Only four types of fuel sources contributed in Australia, namely coal, oil, natural gas and hydro power. In France nuclear power was the fifth contributer in electricity production, as it was also the major producer of electricity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 213, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
... 25units each. The average contributers were oil and nuclear power as they produce 2...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1667.0 965.302439024 173% => OK
No of words: 320.0 196.424390244 163% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.209375 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 3.73543355544 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91627806191 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.353125 0.547539520022 64% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 512.1 283.868780488 180% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5365776532 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.1875 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.4375 5.23603664747 27% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 3.70975609756 297% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197034291123 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102906275619 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.081613885969 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180829847167 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0828223760798 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.