The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The plans illustrate the difference in design in the present design of an airport and that of it after the development plan in the coming year.
Apparently, changes of location of existing facilities and addition of new ones are observed by comparison. Regarding changes of location, the gates will be more than double after one year from eight gates to eighteen. The cafe at the right corner in the left room will be moved to the left opposite corner of it and an additional one will be in the right room in the new design. Check-in will be replaced by Bag-drop and it will be moved to where the cafe is placed. In terms of new facilities, walkway paths are changed as new skylines, and new shops will be available. More doors for rooms of 'departure and arrival' will be found in the new plan. Moreover, the ATM machine and a place to hire cars are added in the right room as new facilities.
To sum up, the newly redeveloped airport will have more gates, facilities, and gateways that will add to the convenience of the airport staff and passengers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e development plan in the coming year. Apparently, changes of location of exist...
^^^
Line 3, column 664, Rule ID: ATM_MACHINE[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant ('M' stands for 'machine'). Use simply 'ATM'.
Suggestion: ATM
...be found in the new plan. Moreover, the ATM machine and a place to hire cars are added in t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, if, moreover, regarding, so, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 869.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57368421053 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56434642281 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505263157895 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.736779032 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5555555556 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158173148823 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0732494545797 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525013718766 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135416860801 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357521630173 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.