In some cities, people are choosing cars instead of bicycles, whiles in other cities. Riding bikes are replacing cars. Why is this the case? Which development do you think is better?
In this contemporary setting, transportation tools are given paramount importance. Some are of the opinions that people should use cars as opposed to ride bikes, while others differ in this view. Considering this situation, it is crucial to explore the reasons, and I believe that riding bikes is a better development.
There are several reasons for this situation. To begin with, in some developing countries, there are no bike lanes and bikes are not allowed to carry on subway and buses, so many people tend to drive instead of cycling. To be specific, riding bikes to work or to shopping can cause inconvenience to their life and lead to low efficiency. Consequently, it can undermine the quality of life, so people prefer to drive rather than ride bikes. On the other hand, in some developed countries, people can use the fully functional infrastructures, such as bike lanes, bus, or train. For example, in many wealthy countries, it is more often for people to ride a bike because they have bicycle lanes and they can carry their bike on the bus or trains in case they tired. As a result, people’s lives will not be interrupted by any inconvenience which people cannot drive.
Riding bikes tends to bring more benefit than driving cars, as cycling plays a pivotal role in uplifting people’s quality of life. To be precise, cycling is one of the healthiest exercising methods, which provides people to stay fit during their commuting. Therefore, riding bikes can reduce the chance of catching the illness and improve people’s physical health. Besides, cycling to commute or travel can limit the usage of cars, which tends to restrict the green gas emission, thereby preventing people who are vulnerable to chronic diseases, such as lung ailments or a sore throat, from getting the sickness. Hence, improving public health in the long run.
To sum up, in some poor countries, people riding bikes can result in many inconveniences so that driving can bring more advantages. In many wealthy countries, with the development of good infrastructures, people have no inconvenience of riding bikes. From my point of view, riding bikes will deliver a long-term benefit in improving public health.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, hence, if, so, therefore, while, for example, such as, as a result, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 1.00243902439 1197% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 18.0 5.60731707317 321% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1855.0 965.302439024 192% => OK
No of words: 364.0 196.424390244 185% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09615384615 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 3.73543355544 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88125261867 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 106.607317073 179% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524725274725 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 283.868780488 204% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 15.0 3.36585365854 446% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 8.94146341463 201% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6158476361 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.055555556 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.44444444444 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260128012192 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0897299027588 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518923334168 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174263903906 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474663530561 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 40.7170731707 204% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.