Some people say that advertising is extremely successful at persuading us to buy things. Other people think that advertising is so common that we no longer pay attention to it.
In our modern society, advertising is a common marketing strategy which appears everywhere, especially on social media. People agree that advertising does play a successful role to increase consumption, while others argue that there is no attention on such a trivial advertisement. From my standpoint, I suppose that advertisement is necessary for what people will buy.
On the one hand, advertisement has a great impact on customers' choices, several driving forces will account for this statement. First of all, all products have an eye-catching advertising video or panel to appeal to customers' attention. The popularity and the promotion of products appear on every social media platform, which increases the number of citizens knowing and willing to buy. In addition, advertising provides useful information about the ingredients, the manufacturing process as well as the criteria of the related associations. The celebrities are usually becoming the face of the brand name to develop reliability among consumers.
On the other hand, others who have the opposite thinking said that commonly advertising can not take their attention into it. The reason is that nowadays, too many advertisements are displayed on TV and other platforms, which leads to distraction and unable to concentrate on certain products. However, residents tend to shop at the supermarket, where has a careful systematic process to ensure the high- quality of commodities. Therefore, people can purchase things without worrying about harmful influences, and saving time whenever going shopping.
In conclusion, a quarrelsome between two beliefs, one is advertising is good at persuading customers to pay for their products, in contrast to the idea of no notice attracting by advertisement. From my perspective, I consider the huge impact of this promotion strategy on our consumption.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, so, therefore, well, while, i suppose, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, as well as, first of all, in contrast to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 16.0 5.60731707317 285% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 3.97073170732 378% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 965.302439024 164% => OK
No of words: 284.0 196.424390244 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55985915493 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23415636716 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 106.607317073 168% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630281690141 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 283.868780488 174% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.0900256417 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.785714286 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0714285714 5.23603664747 211% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305101545784 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.088788003325 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729012752256 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176001164446 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.081772209872 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 40.7170731707 221% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, so, therefore, well, while, i suppose, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, as well as, first of all, in contrast to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 16.0 5.60731707317 285% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 3.97073170732 378% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 965.302439024 164% => OK
No of words: 284.0 196.424390244 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55985915493 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23415636716 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 106.607317073 168% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630281690141 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 283.868780488 174% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.0900256417 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.785714286 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0714285714 5.23603664747 211% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305101545784 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.088788003325 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729012752256 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176001164446 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.081772209872 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 40.7170731707 221% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.