Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In some part of societies might believe that the future does not parallel to their academic records, and others might assume that there is a one-to-one relationship between study and success. The first group tends to give freedom to a student to choose their study on what they want to seek without worrying about what the next will be. In the other hand, the second argument might inhibit student to decide unrelated-useful subject.
The first group I like to call them unparalleled believers. They might think that students have always their own characteristic, therefore we cannot push them to conduct a study that they cannot cope with it. The future always speaks with natural way. We cannot concrete the destiny only with academic background. Some pupils could be master in communication, and others might conceive them as wasting ability. That is could be mean that linguistics students cannot deal with our planet problems, as such, climate changes, travelling to the neighborhood planet. If that so be our vital problem, then how about the extinct language and the other problem related to languages. In fact, Linguists may become pioneers to creating AI (artificial intelligence) project because of problem with natural language. If they think communication subject is useless lesson the AI might be just a dream.
The parallel believers, The second group I might call them, tend to connect tend to connect the life achievement with the educational background. In that way, we have to choose properly on subject that is matter much to human problem history. The software programmer and engineer are some sorts of convincing job. Creating the visual program and joint it with the glasses are the phenomenal achievement that can help the trouble-eye persons to remote clearly on their sight problem.
Both views are some way having equal advantages, otherwise, the IT programmer and engineer are reliable job today, but we cannot underestimate the other occupation due to human problems are not simple but complex.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 417, Rule ID: IS_SHOULD[1]
Message: Did you mean 'it'?
Suggestion: it
... conceive them as wasting ability. That is could be mean that linguistics students...
^^
Line 2, column 804, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...cause of problem with natural language. If they think communication subject is use...
^^
Line 4, column 61, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
...way having equal advantages, otherwise, the IT programmer and engineer are reliable jo...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, so, then, therefore, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 1.00243902439 1696% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 33.0 5.60731707317 589% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1698.0 965.302439024 176% => OK
No of words: 328.0 196.424390244 167% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17682926829 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 3.73543355544 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75657642074 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 106.607317073 171% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55487804878 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 283.868780488 180% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 8.94146341463 190% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1452882131 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8823529412 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2941176471 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.35294117647 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215579010748 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658256349886 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553281739355 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120172070759 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0767014106415 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 40.7170731707 192% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.