Study the graph in figure below , which show changes in the amount of food produced in different parts of the world between 1965 and 1988.
The given line graph describes the information about how much food produced in given four countries between year 1965 and 1988.
As it can be clearly seen from the graph that, in 1965 Africa produced 100 amount of food and the graph remained stable till1970. After that it decreased dramatically and reached at 80 in 1988. Western Europe had 110 amount of food and that it significantly increased and reached to approximately 12. In 1980, the graph shows a zigzag trend it stopped at 130 amount.
In remained two countries, Asia produced stable amount of food till 1975, but it drastically rise in 3 years and reached at 150 which was the best amount of food production. As observed in north America , the figure was constant in 1 year and dramatically rose by 120 amount,. After 1975, the graph showed some zigzag trend. It fell to recover between 1980 t0 1985. It dropped down 110 amount food in 1988.
In conclusion, Africa had lowest amount of food production, while, north America stabilize their performance after some zigzag trend. finally Asia was top level country in food production.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 76, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'amount' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'amounts'.
Suggestion: amounts
...graph that, in 1965 Africa produced 100 amount of food and the graph remained stable t...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 217, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'amount' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'amounts'.
Suggestion: amounts
...d at 80 in 1988. Western Europe had 110 amount of food and that it significantly incre...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 359, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'amount' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'amounts'.
Suggestion: amounts
... shows a zigzag trend it stopped at 130 amount. In remained two countries, Asia pr...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...zigzag trend it stopped at 130 amount. In remained two countries, Asia produced...
^^^
Line 4, column 94, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'rises'?
Suggestion: rises
...t of food till 1975, but it drastically rise in 3 years and reached at 150 which was...
^^^^
Line 4, column 203, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...production. As observed in north America , the figure was constant in 1 year and d...
^^
Line 4, column 269, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'amount' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'amounts'.
Suggestion: amounts
... in 1 year and dramatically rose by 120 amount,. After 1975, the graph showed some zig...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 275, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...year and dramatically rose by 120 amount,. After 1975, the graph showed some zigza...
^^
Line 6, column 23, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the lowest'.
Suggestion: had the lowest
... food in 1988. In conclusion, Africa had lowest amount of food production, while, north...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 135, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Finally
...ir performance after some zigzag trend. finally Asia was top level country in food prod...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 135, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: finally,
...ir performance after some zigzag trend. finally Asia was top level country in food prod...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, so, while, as to, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 913.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88235294118 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60085714708 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561497326203 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3545714442 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.0833333333 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5833333333 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.08333333333 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 1.69756097561 648% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322623210924 0.215688989381 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118471340821 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615975448577 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199875192188 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0744407187369 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => The average readability is low. Need to improve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.