The Table and the Bar chart below give information about travelling to work in Houston, Texas. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

We are provided with two graphs, one of them a table, shows how commuting to work with different forms of transport in Houston, Texas. The other one, bar chart, illustrates the amount of CO2 which is emitted from the means of transport showed in Table.

Looking in more detail, it can be seen that the most common modes of transport is car which is driven alone, at 48 percent. The second most popular modes of transport, referred public transport, are train and bus, 37 percent. On the other hand, cyclists and walkers allocate the least percentage to themselves by 15 percent. By comparison, the highest average age of people who travel by pubic transport is 47 years old. However, 39 percent of travelers include the lowest average age related to those who cycle or walk.

As is presented in the bar, cars which are driven alone cause the most pollution due to producing carbon dioxides about 0.032 kilograms, while cars with passengers produce approximately 0.08 kilograms of CO2. Interestingly, just 0.01 kilograms is emitted from public transport. Not surprisingly, cyclists and pedestrians produce no pollution.

Overall, we can conclude that although cars with drivers only are the most popular means of transport to work, they cause more pollution than all the rest.

Votes
Average: 7 (3 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 389, Rule ID: PUBIC_X[1]
Message: Did you mean 'public'?
Suggestion: public
...est average age of people who travel by pubic transport is 47 years old. However, 39 ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, second, so, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1073.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06132075472 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67500245373 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63679245283 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.8799806142 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5454545455 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2727272727 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0720465724788 0.215688989381 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0268587770223 0.103423049105 26% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0282663333819 0.0843802449381 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0440838848535 0.15604864568 28% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0260778248698 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.