The table below is an illustration of difference in the distance that each individual traveled annually through various means during 15 years (1985-2000) in England.
According to the table, short distance modes of commuting like walking as the minimum mile passed by people and bicycle became less popular from the year 1985 to 2000 by 255, 41 miles traveled by each British person decrease to 237 and 42 per mile per person each years, while the local bus had a dramatic drop and from 429 miles went down to 274 miles during the same years.
On the other hand, when it comes to private car use, it is manifest that it had the reputation for the most common mean of transportation either in 1985 or 2000 by 3199 and 4806 mile per person respectively.
The types of public transportation like taxi, train and long distance bud encountered an upward trend and from 13, 289 and 54 miles per British person yearly jumped to 42, 366 and 124 miles respectively between the year 1985 and 2000, in contrast, other version of travelling had a moderate reduction (450-585).
To sum up, it is distinctively determined that the overall distance in miles each person traveled annually faced an increase during a decade and half. Not only the use of fuel consuming means of transportation became more prevalent, environment friendly models of travelling lost its fame.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing as the minimum mile passed by people and bicycle became less popular from the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, in contrast, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1134.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88793103448 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68749913586 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594827586207 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 328.5 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 22.4926829268 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 88.7044092603 43.030603864 206% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 189.0 112.824112599 168% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.6666666667 22.9334400587 169% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 5.23603664747 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105175660768 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0625992172456 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479357889492 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0719435131867 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047700249334 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.9 13.2329268293 158% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.83 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.3012195122 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.9970731707 156% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.