The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.
The table graph shows information about a variety average distance in miles traveled per person per year by different modes in England between 1985 and 2000.
In general term, there was a fluctuation the number of average distance of different transport that people use traveling. Besides, the number of average distance of all modes increased significantly from 4740 miles to 6475 miles from 1985 to 2000.
It is clear from the table chart show that the number of average distance of cur accounted largest than other transport from 3199 miles to 4806 between 195 to 2000. This figure for other accounted second from 450 miles to 585 miles in this period. In contrast, the number of average distance of local bus declined gradually from 429 miles and 274 miles. The figures for walking and train is same ( 255 miles and 289 miles respectively ) in 1985, but walking has trend decreased slight ( 237 miles) while train has tend rose slightly ( 366 miles) in 2000. The number of average of distance of bicycle, long distunce bus and taxi accounted smallest ( 51,54 and 13 miles respectively) in 1985. However, this figures for bicycle dipped slightly ( 41 miles) while bus and taxi increased slightly ( 124 miles and 42 miles respectively).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 395, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he figures for walking and train is same 255 miles and 289 miles respectively in...
^^
Line 3, column 433, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...me 255 miles and 289 miles respectively in 1985, but walking has trend decreased...
^^
Line 3, column 460, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'trended'.
Suggestion: trended
... respectively in 1985, but walking has trend decreased slight 237 miles while train...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 482, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., but walking has trend decreased slight 237 miles while train has tend rose slig...
^^
Line 3, column 510, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'tended'.
Suggestion: tended
...eased slight 237 miles while train has tend rose slightly 366 miles in 2000. The n...
^^^^
Line 3, column 528, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...miles while train has tend rose slightly 366 miles in 2000. The number of average...
^^
Line 3, column 640, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...distunce bus and taxi accounted smallest 51,54 and 13 miles respectively in 1985....
^^
Line 3, column 732, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...this figures for bicycle dipped slightly 41 miles while bus and taxi increased sl...
^^
Line 3, column 780, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es while bus and taxi increased slightly 124 miles and 42 miles respectively.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, second, so, while, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1016.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93203883495 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45585014294 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514563106796 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2958799008 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.888888889 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8888888889 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141959066654 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0767017097216 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119823650354 0.0843802449381 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175508921448 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.155923544846 0.0819641961636 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.