The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The table represents the shift in types of travel in England 1985 and 2000. There are more than five modes to travel, and every type is measured on their total distance in miles.
Overall, in the near distance, the England travellers used to take on three types of vehicle, taxi, long distance bus, and bicycle. In 1985, those vehicles never travelled far more than 55 miles. In contrary, in 2000, bicycle and taxi stood at below 43 miles, but long distance bus reached at 124 miles.
In addition, in the far way distance, these modes of travel, walking, car, local bus train, and other, had been dominating in the number of miles by average England commuters. The top of them was the car, the car had been selected to go far more than 2,000 miles, while others were below 600 miles.
To sum up, The England commuters went in the longer distance in 2000 than in 1985. The England travellers travelled 4,740 miles in 1985, then increased slightly 3,000 miles in 2000.

Votes
Average: 7 (2 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ong distance bus reached at 124 miles. In addition, in the far way distance, thes...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, then, while, in addition, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 800.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6511627907 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21663410124 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581395348837 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8134997357 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.8888888889 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181353701044 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.094335159779 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583234468527 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12814844053 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473740524143 0.0819641961636 58% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.