The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The table depicts the information about the date opened, Kilometers of route, and passenger per year(in millions) about underground railways in London, Paris, Tokyo. Washington DC, Kyoto, Los Angeles.
Overall, Tokyo's Underground Railway System was opened in 1927 with the highest number of passengers, to be specific 1927 million passengers per year with the railway track stretching about 155 kilometers. Whereas, Los Angeles which was opened in 2001 has the least kilometers(28Km) as well as passengers per year (50 million).
Firstly, London has the longest route in Underground Railways Systems which was built in 1863 and 755 million people use trains per year. The second-longest is Paris with 199 Km long and 1191 million people use these underground trains and was inaugurated in 1900. In 1927, Tokyo's highly preferred Underground Railways was built with 1927 million passengers traveling every year. It is also 155 Km long which the third longest route from the table.
In 1976, Washington DC's Underground Railways was inaugurated which was 126 Km, and just 144 million passengers used those trains per year. The Kyoto's Underground Railways was built in 1981 which was only 11 Km long and just 45 million people traveled per year. The least of all was Los Angeles was built in 2001 which was 28 kilometers of route and was used by 50 million passengers per year
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, so, third, well, whereas, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1151.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13839285714 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69041651785 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477678571429 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3265541957 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.636363636 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3636363636 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0991153266124 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0523812950797 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600822448519 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0901438688114 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549213467594 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.