The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities

The given table illustrates comparative information regarding the underground railway system among the different 6 cities.
Overall, it is clear that London has the oldest railway system, vice versa the newest one belongs to Los Angeles.In addition, the highest capacity of subway was observed in Tokyo.
Looking at the details, London's railway system was opened in 1963 and Paris is the second oldest. It was opened in the year 1900. This was then followed by the opening of the railway systems in Tokyo, Washington DC and Kyoto. Los Angeles has the newest subway system, as far as it was opened only in the year 2001. Moreover, London was considered the longest one among the other cities, having 394 rm respectively and it was two times more than in Paris. However, Paris was a second city regarding the capacity passengers per year, reaching 1191.
Tokyo’s railway system has 199km of route, it is fourteen times longer than Kyoto’s subway, consequently with lowest capacity only 45 passengers per year. Washington DC has just over tenfold longer subway than Los Angeles, 126 respectively. Also, there are 144 passengers per year, while Los Angeles’s underground railway system has only 50.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 113, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...a the newest one belongs to Los Angeles.In addition, the highest capacity of subwa...
^^
Line 4, column 106, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the lowest'.
Suggestion: with the lowest
...onger than Kyoto’s subway, consequently with lowest capacity only 45 passengers per year. W...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, look, moreover, regarding, second, so, then, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1010.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15306122449 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62205190355 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581632653061 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.3416567799 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8181818182 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8181818182 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.72727272727 5.23603664747 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181146468306 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0829175230152 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0827922642088 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143701696196 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0904424826292 0.0819641961636 110% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.