the table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities

Essay topics:

the table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities

The table illustrates statistics about six different nations for the subterranean railroad systems.

It is clear that the three oldest underground systems are larger and have more passengers than the newer systems.

The London underground opened in 1863 is the oldest system and has the largest in terms of size, with 394 kilometres of route. The secondary oldest opened in 1900 is Paris, with 199 kilometres of route. However, it serves more people per year than London underground, with 1191 million passengers in the same time. Tokyo system is the third in terms of size, and it attracts the most used, with 1927 million customers per year.

Of the three newer networks, the kilometres of route in Washington DC is 126, while there only are 11 kilometres for Kyoto and 28 kilometres for Los Angeles. The Los Angeles network opened in 2001 is the newest, while the Kyoto underground is the smallest and serves only 45 passengers per year.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 215, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ith 199 kilometres of route. However, it serves more people per year than London ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, third, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 793.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98742138365 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59945559988 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522012578616 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.9996603236 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.125 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126942229814 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621350330521 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535606639903 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0918519269619 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525334241026 0.0819641961636 64% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.