The table below shows the figures for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.
The bar graph shown under illustrates the imprisonment figures studied on a 10-year interval from 1930-1980 in Great Britain, Australia, New Zealand, United State and Canada, which is measured by thousands.
The results from study conducted in five countries revealed that in the 50 year period, American citizens had the most number of detainees with 140,000 by 1980 while Great Britain obtained the lowest rate of imprisonment by approximately 30,000 on 1930. Although the previously mentioned country had the lowest number of imprisonment at the start of this study, based on the results figures continually rise from time to time in a consistent manner. By 1980, Great Britain was second to the least in ranking with 85,000 convicts. America, on the other hand was secondary to Canada on 1930. But as the study went on, there had been on increment and decrement in results in minimal differences, though it was unlikely at the end. A 50,000 addition to inmates was recorded by 1980 from 90,00 to 140,000 respectively.
Furthermore, other countries involved in this study seemingly had an interesting trend in terms of result. Australia started off with 70,000 by 1930 that declined to around 45,000 in 1940. Numbers increased and peaked on 1970 to 80,000 which immediately dropped to 45,000 in the last year of the study. New Zealand was even with United States on 1930 by 100,000 detainees. In 1940, a 45,000 decline in figure was recorded that rose gradually until 1980 to 85,000. Canada came out of the strongest at the beginning of the research by 120,000. A decrement of 10,000 was seen by 1940 and a little addition tatalling to around 115,000 was recorded the following decade. A decreasing trend was noted in the next 2 decades yet by 1980, a 10,000 approximate was added to their number of inmates.
All in all, this graph showed that Unite States has almost always been on the top spot along side Canada. Great Britain had a growing number of detainees throughout the decades in a gradual manner. Canada, anyhow, had the top spot at the beginning of this research. Having fluctuates in figures by 1930-1980, ended at the second spot. Australia and New Zealand illustrated shifts in results but have alwys been in a steady pace leading them to mid-spot at all times.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 427, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a consistent manner" with adverb for "consistent"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ures continually rise from time to time in a consistent manner. By 1980, Great Britain was second to t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 88, Rule ID: ALONG_SIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'alongside'?
Suggestion: alongside
... has almost always been on the top spot along side Canada. Great Britain had a growing num...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 178, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a gradual manner" with adverb for "gradual"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ber of detainees throughout the decades in a gradual manner. Canada, anyhow, had the top spot at th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, second, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 85.0 33.7804878049 252% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1904.0 965.302439024 197% => OK
No of words: 385.0 196.424390244 196% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94545454545 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 3.73543355544 119% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66588423896 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 106.607317073 187% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516883116883 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 538.2 283.868780488 190% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 8.94146341463 224% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.2158092636 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 3.70975609756 350% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0936722509286 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0347781792943 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0371341586093 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0729644458527 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320820195741 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 40.7170731707 216% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.