The table gives information of the numbers of employees working in four sectors in terms of age groups in the UK over an 8 years period.
It is immediately apparent that different changes can be seen in different sectors and ages, and, in particular a huge rise showed in technology.
In 1998, education was the most popular employment sector, almost all the age groups witnessed a largest number, excepted the 18-25 age group, which was second smallest number, at 6388. Building has a considerably more employees in the 36-45 age group, more than twice as many as that of other age groups, at 21555. Hotel & catering has a relatively more balanced figure in the age below 45 and it dropped significantly when the age above 46. The numbers of workers in technology fields were relatively lower than other sectors, especially in terms of the people aged 56 to 65, only 800.
When time went to 2006, numbers of employees worked in the technology fields rocketed in all age groups, and the largest number occurred in 26-35 group, at 454375. In contrast, building saw a reverse pattern, dropping in all age groups. It should be noticed that there were more older workers employed in hotel & catering, increasing for more than on third. The figures regarding education remained relatively stable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 94, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ctor, almost all the age groups witness a largest number, excepted the 18-25 age ...
^
Line 5, column 566, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of the people aged 56 to 65, only 800. When time went to 2006, numbers of emplo...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 275, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'older' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: older
...s. It should be noticed that there were more older workers employed in hotel & catering, i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, second, third, in contrast, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1063.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94418604651 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62742330521 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590697674419 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4067790119 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.3 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235773954446 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0905795331161 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0772792905052 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148610988075 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0793083213605 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.