The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.

The pie chart gives information about the surveys of visitors satisfaction between their visit, and the bar chart indicates the number of visitors between the before and the year after refurbishment to Ashdown Museum during the same two times period.

Overall, there were more visitors complacent the year after renovation than the year before the restoration. During the year before the renovation, a number of visitors to Ashdown Museum were 74,000 visitors. However, after the year renewal Ashdown Museum a visitors increased to 92,000 visitors.

The year before the restoration a visitors was dissatisfied by 40 %, following by defer dissatisfied by 30 %. Then again, the year before the restoration the total of visitors was every satisfied and satisfied by 25%. Furthermore, The year after refurbishment a total of visitors rising satisfied and every satisfied to 75%. Alternatively, dissatisfied and every dissatisfied declined to 20 between the year after renewal. However, no response was stable in the year before and the year after replenishment.

Votes
Average: 8.6 (3 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 257, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a visitor' or simply 'visitors'?
Suggestion: a visitor; visitors
..., after the year renewal Ashdown Museum a visitors increased to 92,000 visitors. The ye...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 33, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a visitor' or simply 'visitors'?
Suggestion: a visitor; visitors
...ors. The year before the restoration a visitors was dissatisfied by 40 %, following by ...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 901.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52760736196 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04869569727 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 73.0 106.607317073 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.447852760736 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.0323964748 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.111111111 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88888888889 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.480155876777 0.215688989381 223% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.228573168089 0.103423049105 221% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0904648327558 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.347781652502 0.15604864568 223% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519438510334 0.0819641961636 63% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.