The Table below shows the percentage of first year students who gave very good rating to the resources provided by a collage.
The given tabular chart illustrates the information about the fraction of students who completely satisfied from resources offered by the collage, for economics, law and commerce.
Overall, it is clear that most of the Commerce students were got full gratification from all resources provided by academic institution. Minor proportion of economic students gave high rates to pre - course information .
To commence with, 95%of Commerce students satisfied from pre - course information ;however, equivalent figure for other sources was only 81 %. While, teaching resources satisfied 95%of economic students, fraction for pre - course information and other sources was merely59-60%. The students of Commerce stream who fully satisfied from teaching, tutor and print resources accounted for 95%,93,and 86%respectively.
Moving further, the resource which regarded best by law students was the educator which provide gratification to 76 %students. During first year, there was only 62% of students who gave very good rating to teaching. It is interesting to note that the fraction of law students for rating pre - course information and print material was almost equal (70%).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 219, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e high rates to pre - course information . To commence with, 95%of Commerce s...
^^
Line 5, column 3, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tes to pre - course information . To commence with, 95%of Commerce students s...
^^
Line 7, column 186, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... there was only 62% of students who gave very good rating to teaching. It is inte...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1001.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.81976744186 4.92477711251 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03531480537 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56976744186 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.0162274052 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.222222222 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254283218573 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126083071946 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105571794075 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169253063744 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0784642022937 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 61.2550243902 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 11.4140731707 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.