The table below shows the results of a survey of the average number of cars per hour using three suburban roads during working hours in a ten-year pollution monitoring program. Traffic calming was introduced in harper lane at the begging of 1999.

Essay topics:

The table below shows the results of a survey of the average number of cars per hour using three suburban roads during working hours in a ten-year pollution monitoring program. Traffic calming was introduced in harper lane at the begging of 1999.

The table illustrates the outcomes of the average quantity of automobiles per hour driving in Harper Lane, Great York Way, and Long Lane, during working hours in a decade pollution monitoring program and the survey was conducted from 1993 to 2002.

To begin with, there was a moderate increasing trend saw in Long Lane, with the number recording from 400 in 1993 to 800 in 1996. However, a small dip was depicted in the next two years, with 638 and 700 respectively. As the figure for Great York Way, it started at 600, and reached its first peak at 720 in 1994, followed by a slight decline to 630 in 1997. Interestingly, Harper Lane saw the lowest figure in 1883 with 82, and this number climbed rapidly with 5 years. Finally, reaching its peak at 915 in 1998.

By 2002, Long Lane had had the highest number among all three roads, peaking at 1400 in 2002, when this figure is 7 times as many as the figure for Harper Lane. The figure for Great York way remained about the same level, around 900 in the last five years.
Overall, Long Lane had the most number of cars per hour using among all three suburban roads, Harper changed most dramatically.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 20, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: had
...k at 915 in 1998. By 2002, Long Lane had had the highest number among all three road...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 954.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56459330144 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28603006809 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5041246824 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264991359344 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103371185811 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110089619447 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190414422909 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11338990779 0.0819641961636 138% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.