The table shows the number of mobile phones and personal computers per 1000 people in 2003 in 6 different counties. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given table illustrates the number of cell phones and computers per 1000 people in 2003 in six different countries, namely- Luxemburg, Italy, Singapore, Germany, South Korea and China.
Overall, people of Luxemburg used the highest number of cell phones and PCs. Whereas, Chinese owned the least number of PCs and cell phones.
Among all countries, Luxemburg had the most cell phone and PC Owners ( 872 and 900 per 1000 people respectively) compared to China, which had the lowest owner for same electronic device and made up 35 and 88 per thousand people respectively. Italy was following Luxemburg with 737 cell phones and 480 computer user per thousand citizen.
However, Singapore had almost same number of computer users and cell phone users, which constituted approximately 700 per thousand people. In terms of mobile owners, Germany and South Korea had lower user compare to other countries, account for 586 and 380 per thousand citizen, except only Chine. In contrast, equal number of personal computer holder were lived in Germany and South Korea with almost half of their number of citizen (452 per thousand).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 69, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rg had the most cell phone and PC Owners 872 and 900 per 1000 people respectively...
^^
Line 7, column 205, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., Germany and South Korea had lower user compare to other countries, account for ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 946.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1978021978 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48383251903 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582417582418 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9241297234 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.142857143 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224767407737 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11955496052 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05904005658 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154738354858 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584315934413 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.